... sealed.^4.1

A problem with estimating intelligence is that we must estimate motivations. For this discussion, please assume that my estimate of my cat's motivation is correct.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... Wordsworth.^4.2

Recall my previous footnote, which says ``A problem with estimating intelligence is that we must estimate motivations. For this discussion, please assume that my estimate of my cat's motivation is correct.''

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... god^9.1

In case you're interested, god, almighty or otherwise, doesn't exist, but that's beside the point.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.

... parent.^12.1

A more common definition is ``a clone is grown from a single cell'', but this is equivalent except that it implies technique. Another common definition is ``clone is an identical copy of its parent''. This is also equivalent though it focuses on effect. See ``clone'' at MSN's Encarta or see your local dictionary. Also see ``cloning'' at Wikipedia.

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.